&
Advertise Here with Today.com
 

Oct 01 2008

Response to Mr. Merlin Jetton’s Critique of My Essays on Road Privatization – Part 2

Published by G. Stolyarov II at 6:00 am under Economics Edit This

When responding to my article, “How to Privatize the Roads: The Mechanisms and Benefits of Road Privatization,” Mr. Merlin Jetton rightly pointed out that not all Roman roads that were built lasted for 2000 years and that some of them were specifically designed to be temporary. Moreover, Roman roads were not always built under “free-market” conditions, and their construction often employed slave and conscript labor. I grant all of this, but my point with regard to Roman roads did not rule out some of their shortcomings. Rather, I simply wished to emphasize that the technology for building permanent roads has existed for a long time, and one would expect today’s technology to be far superior to any methods the Romans had. And yet, despite the massive technological superiority and continuing advances of our time, road quality in places like Chicago continues to be dismal. I wonder why, and I see no answer besides government intervention and favoritism.

Sincerely,
Gennady Stolyarov II

Editor-in-Chief, The Rational Argumentator: http://rationalargumentator.com

Writer, Associated Content: http://www.associatedcontent.com/user/46796/g_stolyarov_ii.html

Author, Implied Consent, A Play on the Sanctity of Human Life: http://rationalargumentator.com/impliedconsent.html

Author, A Rational Cosmology: http://rationalargumentator.com/rc.html

Author, The Best Self-Help is Free: http://rationalargumentator.com/selfhelpfree.html                     

Author, The Progress of Liberty Blog: http://progressofliberty.today.com/

Possibly-related Articles:                                        (auto-generated)
Advertise Here with Today.com

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

Advertise Here
Some Today.com contributors may have received a fee or a promotional product or service from a manufacturer for promotional consideration, while others receive no consideration at all. Each contributor is responsible for disclosing any such promotional consideration.