&
Advertise Here with Today.com
 

Archive for July, 2008

Jul 31 2008

The Victory of Truth is Never Assured! - Part 5

Published by G. Stolyarov II under Culture Edit This

The fourth reason why the truth rarely wins out is that the proponents of false ideas are often persistent, clever, and well organized. They promote their ideas – which they may well believe to be the truth – just as assiduously, if not more so, than the proponents of truth promote their ideas. In fact, how true an idea is might matter when it comes to the long-term viability of the culture and society whose participants adopt it; but it matters little with regard to how persuasive people find the idea. After all, if truth were all that persuaded people, then bizarre beer ads that imply that by drinking beer one will have fancy cars and lots of beautiful women  would not persuade anyone.  The persistence of advertising that focuses on anything but the actual merits and qualities of the goods and services advertised shows that truth and persuasiveness are two entirely different qualities.

Sincerely,
Gennady Stolyarov II

Editor-in-Chief, The Rational Argumentator: http://rationalargumentator.com

Writer, Associated Content: http://www.associatedcontent.com/user/46796/g_stolyarov_ii.html

Author, Implied Consent, A Play on the Sanctity of Human Life: http://rationalargumentator.com/impliedconsent.html

Author, A Rational Cosmology: http://rationalargumentator.com/rc.html

Author, The Best Self-Help is Free: http://rationalargumentator.com/selfhelpfree.html                           

Author, The Progress of Liberty Blog: http://progressofliberty.today.com/   

Advertise Here with Today.com

No responses yet

Jul 30 2008

The Victory of Truth is Never Assured! - Part 4

Published by G. Stolyarov II under Culture Edit This

The third reason for the difficulty true ideas have in winning is the information problem. No one person has access to all or even a remote fraction of the truth, and certainly no one person can claim to be in possession of all the true ideas required to prevent or even optimally minimize all human folly, aggression, and self-destruction. Moreover, just because a true idea exists somewhere and someone knows it does not mean that many people will be actively seeking it out. Improving information dispersal through such technologies as the Internet certainly helps inform many more people than would have been informed otherwise, but this still requires a fundamental willingness to seek out truth on the part of people. Some have this willingness; others could not care less.

Sincerely,
Gennady Stolyarov II

Editor-in-Chief, The Rational Argumentator: http://rationalargumentator.com

Writer, Associated Content: http://www.associatedcontent.com/user/46796/g_stolyarov_ii.html

Author, Implied Consent, A Play on the Sanctity of Human Life: http://rationalargumentator.com/impliedconsent.html

Author, A Rational Cosmology: http://rationalargumentator.com/rc.html

Author, The Best Self-Help is Free: http://rationalargumentator.com/selfhelpfree.html                           

Author, The Progress of Liberty Blog: http://progressofliberty.today.com/   

No responses yet

Jul 29 2008

The Victory of Truth is Never Assured! - Part 3

Published by G. Stolyarov II under Culture Edit This

The second reason why truth rarely wins in human societies – at least in the short-to-intermediate term is that  people’s lifespans are (thus far in our history) finite. While many people do learn from their experiences and from abstract theory and recognize more of the truth as they get older, those people also tend to die at alarming rates and be replaced by newer generations that more often than not make the same mistakes and commit the same fallacies. The prevalence of age-old superstitions – including beliefs in ghosts, faith healing, and socialism – can be explained by the fact that the same tempting fallacies tend to afflict most unprepared minds, and it takes a great deal of time and intellectual training for most people to extricate themselves from them – unless they happened to have particularly enlightened and devoted parents. If all people lived forever, one could expect them to learn from their mistakes and fallacies eventually and for the prevalence of those errors to asymptotically approach zero over time.

Sincerely,
Gennady Stolyarov II

Editor-in-Chief, The Rational Argumentator: http://rationalargumentator.com

Writer, Associated Content: http://www.associatedcontent.com/user/46796/g_stolyarov_ii.html

Author, Implied Consent, A Play on the Sanctity of Human Life: http://rationalargumentator.com/impliedconsent.html

Author, A Rational Cosmology: http://rationalargumentator.com/rc.html

Author, The Best Self-Help is Free: http://rationalargumentator.com/selfhelpfree.html                           

Author, The Progress of Liberty Blog: http://progressofliberty.today.com/   

One response so far

Jul 28 2008

The Victory of Truth is Never Assured! - Part 2

Published by G. Stolyarov II under Culture Edit This

Why does the truth not always – indeed, virtually never, up until the very recent past – win out in human societies among the majority of people? Indeed, why can one confidently say that most people are wrong about most intellectual matters and matters of policy most of the time? A few reasons will be explored here and subsequently.                

First, the vast majority of people are short-sighted and unaware of secondary effects of their actions. For instance, they see the direct effects of government redistribution of wealth – especially if they are on the receiving end – as positive. They get nice stuff, after all. But the indirect secondary effects – the reduced incentives of the expropriated to produce additional wealth – are not nearly so evident. They require active contemplation, which most people are too busy to engage in at that sophisticated a level.

Sincerely,
Gennady Stolyarov II

Editor-in-Chief, The Rational Argumentator: http://rationalargumentator.com

Writer, Associated Content: http://www.associatedcontent.com/user/46796/g_stolyarov_ii.html

Author, Implied Consent, A Play on the Sanctity of Human Life: http://rationalargumentator.com/impliedconsent.html

Author, A Rational Cosmology: http://rationalargumentator.com/rc.html

Author, The Best Self-Help is Free: http://rationalargumentator.com/selfhelpfree.html                           

Author, The Progress of Liberty Blog: http://progressofliberty.today.com/   

2 responses so far

Jul 27 2008

The Victory of Truth is Never Assured! - Part 1

Published by G. Stolyarov II under Culture Edit This

Many advocates of free markets, reason, and liberty are content to just sit back and let things take their course, thinking that the right ideas will win out, by virtue of being true and therefore in accord with the objective reality. Sooner or later, these people think, the contradictions entailed in false ideas – contradictions obvious to the free-market advocates – will become obvious to everybody. Moreover, false ideas will result in bad consequences that people will rebel against and begin to apply true ideas. While this view is tempting – and I wish it reflected reality – I am afraid that it misrepresents the course that policies and intellectual trends take, as well as the motivations of most human beings. We will explore this issue in the next few days.  

Sincerely,
Gennady Stolyarov II

Editor-in-Chief, The Rational Argumentator: http://rationalargumentator.com

Writer, Associated Content: http://www.associatedcontent.com/user/46796/g_stolyarov_ii.html

Author, Implied Consent, A Play on the Sanctity of Human Life: http://rationalargumentator.com/impliedconsent.html

Author, A Rational Cosmology: http://rationalargumentator.com/rc.html

Author, The Best Self-Help is Free: http://rationalargumentator.com/selfhelpfree.html                           

Author, The Progress of Liberty Blog: http://progressofliberty.today.com/   

No responses yet

Jul 26 2008

Get a Good Laugh from Edward Current’s Videos on Atheism and Religion

Published by G. Stolyarov II under Atheism Edit This

Edward Current is a YouTube satirist and comedian, who often parodies the arguments and attitudes of those militant and intolerant religious types who would seek to wage a “War on Atheism.” Watching his videos will certainly give you many good laughs – as well as the satisfaction of knowing that satire in the tradition of Molière and Voltaire has not perished in our time.

Oddly enough, some people – including certain atheists – fail to recognize at first that Mr. Current’s videos are all satire. I repeatedly see comments to this effect next to his videos. Why might that be? One possibility is that Mr. Current is capable of satirizing arguments made by certain intolerant Christians by stating those arguments almost verbatim. Too many people seriously hold fanatical views of this sort, and Mr. Current is doing the world a great service by exposing how ludicrous they are.

Note that I do not mean this post to condemn respectful, civil, sophisticated Christians or members of any other religion. I do not think that Mr. Current does, either, as indicated by his video on the God Delusion Index. But the religious militants need to be socially combated through both serious and humorous speech until their ideas become widely perceived to be as unacceptable as traditional Chinese foot-binding and traditional Indian widow-burning are today.

Sincerely,
Gennady Stolyarov II

Editor-in-Chief, The Rational Argumentator: http://rationalargumentator.com

Writer, Associated Content: http://www.associatedcontent.com/user/46796/g_stolyarov_ii.html

Author, Implied Consent, A Play on the Sanctity of Human Life: http://rationalargumentator.com/impliedconsent.html

Author, A Rational Cosmology: http://rationalargumentator.com/rc.html

Author, The Best Self-Help is Free: http://rationalargumentator.com/selfhelpfree.html                           

Author, The Progress of Liberty Blog: http://progressofliberty.today.com/   

One response so far

Jul 25 2008

YouTube Reinstates Extant Dodo Productions: A Victory for Free Speech

Extant Dodo Productions, a team of two MD/PhD students making in-depth video commentaries refuting popular fallacies, dogmas, and quackeries, had for some time been suspended by the YouTube administration for allegedly violating YouTube’s “terms of policy,” even though not even any breach of civility had taken place on the part of Extant Dodo. What actually happened was a concerted flagging effort by haters of rational ideas that triggered YouTube’s automated banning threshold.

But now sensible people have once again taken control and reinstated Extant Dodo’s account several days ago. You can visit it here. I encourage you to watch and rate highly any or all of their 28 excellent videos. This is encouraging news for others whose accounts had been suspended for no offense except that their ideas were disliked by some.

Sincerely,
Gennady Stolyarov II

Editor-in-Chief, The Rational Argumentator: http://rationalargumentator.com

Writer, Associated Content: http://www.associatedcontent.com/user/46796/g_stolyarov_ii.html

Author, Implied Consent, A Play on the Sanctity of Human Life: http://rationalargumentator.com/impliedconsent.html

Author, A Rational Cosmology: http://rationalargumentator.com/rc.html

Author, The Best Self-Help is Free: http://rationalargumentator.com/selfhelpfree.html                           

Author, The Progress of Liberty Blog: http://progressofliberty.today.com/   

No responses yet

Jul 24 2008

“The Politics of Showmanship” by Alan Caruba | The Rational Argumentator

Published by G. Stolyarov II under Politics Edit This

The Rational Argumentator

A Journal for Western Man

Principal Index *** Contributors *** Yahoo! Group

The Politics of Showmanship

Alan Caruba

Issue CLXVIII - July 24, 2008

Recommend this page.

For political theatre, there is no denying that the speech Sen. Barack Obama delivered in Berlin drew a huge, adoring crowd and was filled with the kind of talk intended to impress, not just Berliners, not just Europe, not just America, but the entire world that a new leader has appeared on the scene to work miracles.

Chuck Todd, the NBC News political director summed it up best when he pointed out that the same speech could have been delivered by Sen. John McCain because its content was ideologically the same in many ways. The critical difference is that McCain is imbued with the values of a family that has fought to protect American values, American freedoms for generations.

Both believe that industrialization and modern society is contributing to a climate apocalypse of melting Arctic ice and rising sea levels. Both believe the free world must defeat Islamofascist terrorism. The former is a corruption of science. The latter is the single most important issue of our times. At one point, Obama sounded a call for Iran to relinquish its nuclear weapons ambitions.

“People of the world, this is our moment, this is our time…”, said Obama, followed by an echo of Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s Four Freedoms, citing freedom from fear and freedom from want. The other freedoms Roosevelt cited on January 6, 1941 were freedom of speech and expression, and freedom to worship as one chooses. Islamic fundamentalism opposes both.

The date of the Roosevelt speech is worth noting because nine months later, on September 7, 1941, the United States suffered a sneak attack on Pearl Harbor by the Empire of Japan, plunging it into World War Two. Congress declared war against Germany as well. Not since those days has a craven Congress formally declared war on any nation despite the Constitutional requirement to do so.

Roosevelt had called for “a world-wide reduction of armaments to such a point and in such a thorough fashion that no nation will be in a position to commit an act of physical aggression against any neighbor– anywhere in the world.”

In Berlin, Obama made a similar call for a reduction of nuclear weapons, but this ignores the fact that once invented, no technology can be un-invented, and a new technology can be used for good or evil. It took a nuclear weapon to end Japan’s aggression.

The notion that nuclear weapons will be reduced or the threat of their use be eliminated is no more plausible today than FDR’s wish for a reduction of armaments in 1941. Those in leadership positions seem to feel they have to say such things, but they know better.

Obama and McCain should know better when they talk about global warming and say stupid things about either of the poles melting or rising sea levels. Talk of reducing carbon emissions is baseless given the fact that carbon dioxide plays virtually no role in climate change. The Earth has been through any number of ice ages, has seen mass extinctions of life, and, after 4.5 billion years, continues as the only place in our galaxy with life forms as complex as ours.

An estimated 100,000 gathered to hear Obama, and one cannot help but be reminded that Germans gathered in the 1930s to hear another spellbinding speaker. That one plunged Europe into war. The urge to be part of a huge movement is a powerful component of the human psyche, but that doesn’t mean that any good will come of it. As often as not, it has led to bloodshed and misery.

So listening to Obama toss off phrases about “global citizenship” and the need to “share the benefits (of wealth) more equitably” because such wealth should not “favor the few” tended to get my attention amidst the bursts of applause. That is the promise of communism, not capitalism.

When I hear Obama say that “this is our moment, this is our time” I think that this is always everyone’s moment, everyone’s time, and that is an individual thing, not something to be melded into a vast collective ideology that will ultimately destroy individual rights, human rights.

What we are witnessing is the showmanship of politics. What we are hearing are ideas and beliefs that obscure the same dangerous ideologies that have caused so much conflict and misery that, if we fall prey to the theatrics of Barack Hussein Obama, we will surely pay a fearful price.

­­___________

Alan Caruba writes a weekly column posted on the Internet site of The National Anxiety Center, www.anxietycenter.com. He blogs daily at http://factsnotfantasy.blogspot.com.

© Alan Caruba, July 2008

Recommend this page.

This TRA feature has been edited in accordance with TRA’s Statement of Policy.

Click here to return to TRA’s Issue CLXVIII Index.

No responses yet

Jul 24 2008

Video: “Remarks Regarding Ben Bernanke’s Testimony” by Ron Paul | The Rational Argumentator

Published by G. Stolyarov II under Economics Edit This

The Rational Argumentator

A Journal for Western Man

Principal Index *** Contributors *** Yahoo! Group

Remarks Regarding Ben Bernanke’s Testimony - Video

Ron Paul

Issue CLXVIII - July 24, 2008

Recommend this page.

Today’s video features Congressman Ron Paul, discussing the recent remarks Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke made before the House Financial Services Committee. Interestingly enough, Bernanke acknowledged that inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon, yet he wishes to engage in it anyway! Bernanke even admitted that inflation is a stealth tax, but one that is more politically feasible because most people do not notice the source of or reasons for its imposition. Watch this video and give it a rating of five stars. On this page, you will be able to both rate the video and find a link that will enable you to digg it.

­­___________

Recommend this page.

This TRA feature has been edited in accordance with TRA’s Statement of Policy.

Click here to return to TRA’s Issue CLXVIII Index.

No responses yet

Jul 23 2008

“Documentary: Global Warming Doomsday Called Off” by Lars Oxfeldt Mortensen | The Rational Argumentator

Published by G. Stolyarov II under Science Edit This

The Rational Argumentator

A Journal for Western Man

Principal Index *** Contributors *** Yahoo! Group

Documentary: Global Warming Doomsday Called Off

Lars Oxfeldt Mortensen

Issue CLXVIII - July 23, 2008

Recommend this page.

“Global Warming Doomsday Called Off” was written and directed by filmmaker Lars Oxfeldt Mortensen and focuses on the work of numerous eminent scientists who dispute the misnamed “climate change consensus.” This excellent documentary was shown on CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation) Television. Now you can see it for free online. Be sure to go to this page and give it a rating of five stars.

Hopefully, films like this one will put increasing pressure on the political elites who wish to use scientifically unverified “climate change” as an excuse to regulate, tax, and restrict the lifestyle choices of the vast majority of people. The more people know that no consensus exists on “climate change” and that the best evidence points that man is not the cause of any observed warming, the more likely the statists’ plans will be to fail.

No responses yet

Next »

Advertise Here